Sinar 54M digital back for Sinar 4x5', with. Photographing is possible in the entire focusing range but the pleasure received from good manual focusing is not. Sinar 54M digital back for Sinar 4x5', with. Photographing is possible in the entire focusing range but the pleasure received from good manual focusing is not. Sinar large format instruction manual, user manual, free PFD camera manuals SINAR large format Posted 7-21-'07 to 12-2--'12 The next page contains information on this camera. If the image below looks like your camera, click below to see the full manual. This camera manual library is for reference and historical purposes, all rights reserved. This page is copyright © by ' ' M. This page may not be sold or distributed without the expressed permission of the producer I have no connection with any camera company On-line camera manual library If you find this manual useful, how about a donation of $3 to: M. Butkus, 29 Lake Ave., High Bridge, NJ and send your e-mail address so I can thank you. Most other places would charge you $7.50 for a electronic copy or $18.00 for a hard to read Xerox copy. This will help me to continue to host this site, buy new manuals, and pay their shipping costs. It'll make you feel better, won't it? Snake 3d pc game. If you use Pay Pal, use the link below. Use the above address for a check, M.O. RIGHT CLICK ON LINK BELOW, CHOOSE ' SAVE TARGET AS' SAVE TO FOLDER OF YOUR CHOICE (Acrobat 7.0 or Foxit PDF needed to read it). Looking at discontinued second hand backs, Sinar 54M comes up as good deal concerning price/performance compared to other discontinued backs from other manufacturers. However, I cannot find a raw file (sti) to get a rough idea how it performs and test it with my post-processing tools. For some reason it seems to be a bit sensitive for manufacturers to provide raw files (there are exceptions though) so I could not find any at Sinar's web site. Is someone using a Sinar 54M that could provide a sti file to look? Perhaps it is taboo asking for raw files, not sure, but I would be glad to get one to look. That's good to hear! The other worry I have though (I always worry) is that old sensor tech might not perform as well as I'd expect/want. I've followed the pro digital second hand market for some time, and the general pattern is when something gets down to a price range similar to 35mm digital it is beyond obsolete. Image QualityThe Sinar 54M is really close to that price range now which makes me a juuuust a little bit suspicious about it. It seems like the Sinar 54M was considerably less expensive than other 22 megapixel backs at the time it was available, and also stated lower dynamic range, which also makes me wonder why. So it would be great to get a look at an actual file, normal exposure time, base ISO, to see if there are any obvious problems. The things I care / not care about: • Usuable dynamic range - low noise levels and no pattern noise please. ![]() I've heard something about that it needs 'black calibration' for a few minutes which sounds kind of worrying • Blooming issues - is it possible to shoot into the sun? Rather important • Long exposure performance largly irrelevant (a bonus if it works though) • Base ISO only, higher ISO performance irrelevant I need to find out some stuff around the tethering too, but that may be easier to find via some browsing. Sinar 54m SpecificationsI does seem like it may have a bit more cumbersome workflow than usual [=used to these days] concerning calibration. That's good to hear! The other worry I have though (I always worry) is that old sensor tech might not perform as well as I'd expect/want. I've followed the pro digital second hand market for some time, and the general pattern is when something gets down to a price range similar to 35mm digital it is beyond obsolete. The Sinar 54M is really close to that price range now which makes me a juuuust a little bit suspicious about it. It seems like the Sinar 54M was considerably less expensive than other 22 megapixel backs at the time it was available, and also stated lower dynamic range, which also makes me wonder why.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |